Dave's Fiction Warehouse

In which I bloviate about books, TV, movies, politics and other stuff I know little about..

  • Books
  • Movies
  • TV
  • politics
  • american life
  • Writing
  • Other Stuff

Connect

  • Email
  • Facebook

Powered by Genesis

The annoying Mr. Chu

March 1, 2014 by Dave Knadler

I like games: “Ticket to Ride,” Hearts, “Mafia,” Pinochle … and of course, “Jeopardy.” Especially “Jeopardy.” It always brings out the show-off in me. I love to pop off answers before the contestants can. Behold my genius, friends and family! No matter that my confident answers are often wrong — hey, I not wagering actual money.

So I have a grudging admiration for Arthur Chu, even as I get why so many people are pissed at him. By approaching the game as nothing more than math problem, he’s making it less fun for those of us who routinely ignore statistical probability. Even worse, he’s never even slightly apologetic or sportsmanlike about crushing his foes and amassing more than $238,000 in the process. The guy is a pudgy Mr. Spock, and we are exasperated Dr. McCoys: “I’m a doctor, dammit, not a computer!” Except Chu doesn’t even bother to lift an eyebrow.

alex trebek and arthur chu on jeopardy

There’s a reason Alex isn’t smiling.

In fairness, Mr. Chu’s critics tend to ignore the fact that he still has to answer the questions correctly. And he still, against all logic, has to pose the answer in the form of a question (which is getting kind of old).

Washington Post writer Caitlin Dewey probably has it right when she posits the real reason we find Mr. Chu so irritating:

Chu’s strategy seems to fit into a larger cultural pattern: Now that everything can be measured, quantified and reduced to statistical probabilities, there’s no space for romance or instinct anymore.”

Yep. We don’t like people who play only to win. I’ll take Smug Jerks for a thousand, Alex.

More along these lines:

  • Ten questions. Because 20 is too manyTen questions. Because 20 is too many
  • Grocery shoppers with masksUnmasked annoyance
  • man in the high castle sceneA vote for the Nazis
  • downton abbey season 4 lady mary‘Downton’: Time for another dead Turk?
  • nebraska TV watchingI’ll take ‘Nebraska’

Filed Under: american life, tv

Comments

  1. John H. says

    March 1, 2014 at 3:47 pm

    Personally, I like it when the contestants just work their way through each category from top to bottom, but I understand the advantages in NOT doing that.

    And I have to like a guy who plans to devote part of his winnings to helping his wife finish her fantasy novel about “talking dogs in the ancient Near East”. If that’s not love, I don’t know what is.

    • Dave Knadler says

      March 1, 2014 at 4:31 pm

      Good point!

Recent posts

  • The cold, hard West
  • The talented Mr. Santos
  • Reich of fools
  • Mad about Harry
  • The Cartwrights
    stand their ground

Recent comments

  • John H. on The cold, hard West
  • Dave Knadler on The talented Mr. Santos
  • John H. on The talented Mr. Santos
  • John H. on Reich of fools
  • Erin on Reich of fools

FInd something

send dave cash

The obligatory PayPal donation button. Go ahead: Make my day.