Dave's Fiction Warehouse

In which I bloviate about books, TV, movies, politics and other stuff -- all without the aid of ChatGPT!

  • Books
  • Movies
  • TV
  • politics
  • american life
  • Writing
  • Other Stuff

Connect

  • Email
  • Facebook

Powered by Genesis

It’s all about the barns

May 14, 2012 by Dave Knadler

mitt romney mail campaign

Suitable for farming.

Today I received some materials from the Romney campaign. That’s the price of registering as an independent. The package included a large photo of the candidate, standing in front of a weathered barn. There’s a tractor in the shot, and an American flag. Mitt is wearing slightly-used jeans. The implication is that the photographer happened by while the candidate was doing chores. Apparently, at Bain Capital there’s more to do than just manage the portfolios of billionaires. You also have responsibilities down at the barn.

The accompanying letter underlines the eight words of the Romney platform: “I stand for freedom and opportunity and hope.” It requests a donation of at least $35. Which seems like kind of an arbitrary figure. Why not $25, or $50? But studies have probably shown that $35 is the magic number among those who prefer policies of eight words or less.

I have yet to receive a similar package from the Obama campaign. When it comes, I expect to see a radically different platform, something like “liberty and the chance to succeed and optimism.” Oh yeah, and we’re with Biden on the gay marriage thing. It will be interesting to see what sort of donation is regarded as the minimum.

Not that it matters. I never give to any political campaign. Mostly because I’m cheap, but also because I’m insulted by the invariable use of disingenuous images and poll-driven positions. Has there ever been an American candidate for anything who didn’t “stand” for freedom and opportunity and hope? Who believed in anything that didn’t poll well? Has there ever been campaign ad that didn’t cast the candidate as the stalwart pal of the blue-collar worker?

Hate to say it, but at this point it’s not entirely clear which of these guys would be the better president. I suppose Obama is less patently fake, and slightly less beholden to gigantic financial institutions. If he gets through the next few months without posing in front of a weathered barn, I might lean that way. But I imagine the chances of that happening are nil.

More along these lines:

  • Maybe somebody will throw up
  • George Santos has a row to himself.The talented Mr. Santos
  • It’s not about contraception
  • mitt romney iowa eight votesJust give him the nomination now
  • Travels in Trumpland

Filed Under: election, politics

Comments

  1. deb says

    May 14, 2012 at 6:13 pm

    Thanks for posting a new entry……I have been making that ‘scream’ face here in reader-land waiting for something new to take it’s place at the top!

  2. John H. says

    May 15, 2012 at 11:20 am

    I just got the reference in the title – very nice.

Recent posts

  • Full frontal Florida
  • Later, alligator
  • A writer on top
    of the short-story game
  • ‘The Passenger’
    will please refrain
  • Floaters in the stream

Recent comments

  • Rachel Kohl on Later, alligator
  • Dave Knadler on Later, alligator
  • John H. on Later, alligator
  • Dave Knadler on Later, alligator
  • Erin Murphy on Later, alligator

FInd something

send dave cash

The obligatory PayPal donation button. Go ahead: Make my day.