Dave's Fiction Warehouse

In which I bloviate about books, TV, movies, politics and other stuff.

  • Books
  • Movies
  • TV
  • politics
  • Other Stuff
  • thatfuckingtrump

Connect

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Powered by Genesis

It’s all about the barns

May 14, 2012 by Dave Knadler

mitt romney mail campaign

Suitable for farming.

Today I received some materials from the Romney campaign. That’s the price of registering as an independent. The package included a large photo of the candidate, standing in front of a weathered barn. There’s a tractor in the shot, and an American flag. Mitt is wearing slightly-used jeans. The implication is that the photographer happened by while the candidate was doing chores. Apparently, at Bain Capital there’s more to do than just manage the portfolios of billionaires. You also have responsibilities down at the barn.

The accompanying letter underlines the eight words of the Romney platform: “I stand for freedom and opportunity and hope.” It requests a donation of at least $35. Which seems like kind of an arbitrary figure. Why not $25, or $50? But studies have probably shown that $35 is the magic number among those who prefer policies of eight words or less.

I have yet to receive a similar package from the Obama campaign. When it comes, I expect to see a radically different platform, something like “liberty and the chance to succeed and optimism.” Oh yeah, and we’re with Biden on the gay marriage thing. It will be interesting to see what sort of donation is regarded as the minimum.

Not that it matters. I never give to any political campaign. Mostly because I’m cheap, but also because I’m insulted by the invariable use of disingenuous images and poll-driven positions. Has there ever been an American candidate for anything who didn’t “stand” for freedom and opportunity and hope? Who believed in anything that didn’t poll well? Has there ever been campaign ad that didn’t cast the candidate as the stalwart pal of the blue-collar worker?

Hate to say it, but at this point it’s not entirely clear which of these guys would be the better president. I suppose Obama is less patently fake, and slightly less beholden to gigantic financial institutions. If he gets through the next few months without posing in front of a weathered barn, I might lean that way. But I imagine the chances of that happening are nil.

More along these lines:

  • zane tanke affordable care act applebee'sAlas for the fast-food crybabies
  • r. crumb's mr. naturalPost-election analysis
  • clint eastwood chryslerIt’s all about hope — that you’ll buy more stuff
  • house republicans payroll tax standoffThe suits are ruining the Republic
  • Come on, Amercia! Wake up!

Filed Under: election, politics

About Dave Knadler

Obscure writer. Lazy photographer. Bashful guitarist. Perhaps too fond of wine. Tireless nemesis of New York Times crosswords, Wordle, Semantle and all other puzzles du jour.

Comments

  1. deb says

    May 14, 2012 at 6:13 pm

    Thanks for posting a new entry……I have been making that ‘scream’ face here in reader-land waiting for something new to take it’s place at the top!

  2. John H. says

    May 15, 2012 at 11:20 am

    I just got the reference in the title – very nice.

Recent posts

  • We don’t need no stinking followers
  • This could be
    the last time
  • Still life with dicks
  • Not throwing away
    my shot
  • February fugue

Recent comments

  • Paul Silverman on We don’t need no stinking followers
  • Dave Knadler on We don’t need no stinking followers
  • Dave Knadler on We don’t need no stinking followers
  • Dave Knadler on We don’t need no stinking followers
  • Dave Knadler on We don’t need no stinking followers

FInd something

send dave cash

The obligatory PayPal donation button. Go ahead: Make my day.